Donald Trump’s re-election has set the stage for a second term that is already reflecting the strategies and mindset honed during his years as a reality TV star. From his time on NBC’s The Apprentice, where he cultivated an image of decisive authority, to his leadership style during his first term, Trump has consistently prioritized spectacle, personality, and audience engagement. As his inauguration on January 20 approaches, his early decisions and floated names for key positions hint at how he intends to govern in his second term.
A presidency designed for the spotlight raises questions about whether its focus lies in effective governance or commanding public attention. Reality TV thrives on drama, conflict, and clear-cut narratives—elements that were central to Trump’s first term and are likely to continue defining his leadership. High-profile actions, controversial executive orders, and public feuds kept him at the center of media cycles during his first four years (New Yorker). Like a reality TV protagonist, Trump thrives on staying in the spotlight, and his return to the presidency is expected to further amplify his focus on visibility and dramatic impact over policy depth or collaboration.
The names being floated for potential cabinet appointments illustrate Trump’s reality-TV-inspired approach to leadership. Figures such as Matt Gaetz, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Pete Hegseth are being discussed for prominent positions in his administration. Gaetz, a staunch Trump ally known for his controversial rhetoric, is reportedly under consideration for Attorney General, despite concerns about the confirmation process (The Australian). Kennedy, an environmental lawyer and vaccine skeptic, has been mentioned as a potential pick for Secretary of Health and Human Services, sparking debate over his unconventional health views (New Yorker). Hegseth, a Fox News host and Army veteran, has been floated as a candidate for Secretary of Defense, raising questions about his administrative experience (Vanity Fair). These considerations, reminiscent of casting decisions in reality TV, prioritize loyalty, drama, and media appeal over traditional qualifications.
Governance that prioritizes spectacle often struggles to balance short-term visibility with long-term solutions. Like a reality show designed for immediate engagement, Trump’s approach emphasizes optics over outcomes. If his second term mirrors his first, we may see a continued preference for bold, headline-grabbing actions that leave critical policy challenges unaddressed. Complex issues risk being oversimplified to fit media-friendly narratives, reducing nuanced problems to binary choices or catchy slogans (Vanity Fair). While this strategy energizes his base, it risks alienating the broader electorate and undermining trust in government.
A reality-TV-style presidency also thrives on conflict, which could further deepen polarization and division. Trump’s leadership often frames governance as a battle between “us” and “them,” a strategy that effectively rallies his supporters but damages social cohesion. Leaning into divisive rhetoric and high-profile feuds could alienate moderates and opposition groups, making bipartisan cooperation nearly impossible. This polarization fosters mistrust among citizens and entrenches societal divisions (New Yorker).
This approach raises concerns about the erosion of institutional integrity. If Trump prioritizes loyalty and media appeal in leadership appointments, government agencies risk becoming further politicized and less effective. Institutions built on professionalism and impartiality may find themselves advancing narrow agendas, undermining their credibility and ability to serve the public. Ethical challenges, including conflicts of interest and diminished transparency, remain a significant concern (Vanity Fair).
On the international stage, the risks are similarly significant. A theatrically driven presidency may be perceived by some allies and adversaries as unreliable or unserious, complicating diplomacy and undermining strategic partnerships. Decisions made for dramatic effect rather than long-term strategy could result in inconsistent foreign policies, harming national interests and weakening global standing (New Yorker).
While Trump’s reality-TV-inspired approach keeps him at the center of attention, it also risks alienating the broader public. Citizens may grow fatigued by constant drama and increasingly demand steady, substantive leadership. If the public perceives decisions as prioritizing entertainment over effective governance, trust in the administration and broader governmental systems could erode further (The Australian).
As Trump prepares to return to the White House, his reality TV background continues to shape his public persona and leadership style. While his emphasis on spectacle and loyalty energizes a base of supporters, it also brings significant risks to governance, institutional integrity, and social cohesion. The coming months and years will reveal whether his theatrically driven strategy evolves into effective leadership or whether its focus on drama and division further strains the nation’s political and social fabric. For now, the United States faces an unprecedented era of leadership that will test the durability of its democratic institutions and public trust in ways never before experienced.
Why Eye Write 